Children’s right to privacy is a fundamental principle that must always be safeguarded, particularly in media reporting, online spaces, and public discourse. Protecting their privacy helps prevent potential harm, including stigma, exploitation, and emotional distress. This right extends to shielding their identities in sensitive cases, such as those involving abuse, bullying, or legal matters, ensuring they are not subjected to unnecessary public scrutiny.
Media Monitoring Africa (MMA) gives IOL a MAD[1] for its recent article, “Tat’s Just Wrong” (27/01/2025). The article raises serious concerns about protecting children in media reporting, IOL compromised a child’s privacy by indirectly disclosing the identity of the mother. It is quite concerning that media still violate rights to privacy and contradicts the provisions of Section 28.2 of the Bill of Rights[2]. This section emphasises that “a child’s best interests must be paramount in all matters concerning the child”. IOL disregarded these protections and failed to uphold its own press code, specifically under section 5.3.2[3], which mandates “the interests of the privacy and the reputation of the child shall be considered and, where necessary, protected”. This oversight not only exposes him to potential harm such as victimisation and discrimination but also sets a concerning precedent for media ethics regarding minors.
The article highlights key issues of child abuse and includes expert insights but lacks balance., Ethical journalism should go beyond shocking headlines and provide comprehensive information that educates the public on the root causes of such issues, including poverty, lack of social support, and the influence of gang culture on vulnerable communities.
MMA urges IOL and all media outlets to exercise caution and adhere to legal and ethical frameworks when reporting on children involved in incidents of crime or abuse. It is imperative that media reports minimise harm to children and prioritise their best interests, as mandated by Section 28.2 of the Bill of Rights.
Therefore, MMA requests IOL to promptly withdraw the mother’s identity from the article. We urge IOL to provide an explanation to its audience regarding this decision.
We encourage the IOL and all media outlets to adopt more ethical practices in reporting on children, ensuring stories prioritise their best interests and well-being.
Written by Tinotenda L. Bangajena.
Edited by Ntombifuthi Kubeka
[1] MADs are given to media for irresponsibly reporting on children and compromising their safety.
[2] Section 28.2 of the Bill of Rights
[3] https://www.independentmediaombud.co.za/press-code/