Children’s right to privacy is fundamental and must be prioritised, especially by the media when reporting on minors. Media Monitoring Africa (MMA) is gravely concerned about an article published by Cape Argus titled “Cape Town Learner Discriminated Against Over Blonde Braids” (01/26/2025), which indirectly exposes the identity of a 14-year-old learner with albinism by specifying her school, grade status and distinctive physical attributes.
With this reason, MMA issues Cape Argus a MAD[1].
The article reports on an incident at Fezeka High School in Gugulethu where the learner was discriminated against due to her natural blonde braids—a unique trait for a child with albinism. While we commend the efforts to address discrimination, the inclusion of specific details such as the learner’s school grade and physical description risks inadvertently identifying her. Such indirect identification is not only ethically problematic but also potentially exposes her to further unnecessary victimisation and harm.
Section 28.2[2] of the Bill of Rights states, “A child’s best interests are of paramount importance in every matter concerning the child.” By disclosing details that can indirectly identify the learner, the report fails to uphold the child’s right to privacy and may lead to stigmatisation and discrimination.
Furthermore, Section 154 (3) of the Criminal Procedure Amendment Act[3] 2021, clearly outlines the conditions under which the media may identify children. The article’s inclusion of her school, grade and distinctive attributes does not meet these conditions, thereby breaching the legal safeguards designed to protect minors from unnecessary exposure.
The article’s reference to the learner’s school, grade status and her physical traits makes it easier for members of the community to identify her, putting her at risk. Such disclosure fails to consider the potential harm that may arise from public scrutiny, harassment, or further discrimination. Ethical journalism requires that children’s best interests be always protected, yet this reporting approach compromises the learner’s privacy and dignity.
MMA urges Cape Argus to take immediate remedial action by removing or altering references to the learner’s status and other details that could lead to her identification. Additionally, Cape Argus should show clarification explaining the necessary adjustments made to protect the child, reinforcing its commitment to responsible journalism.
While we recognise the importance of reporting on issues of discrimination, it is imperative that such reporting does not compromise the privacy and safety of minors. MMA calls on Cape Argus to withdraw or minimize identifying details.
We encourage Cape Argus and all media outlets to adopt more ethical practices in reporting on children, ensuring stories prioritise their best interests and well-being.
Written by Siphokazi Pikoko
Edited by Ntombifuthi Kubeka
[1] MAD- MADs are given when media outlets have been found to irresponsibly report on children, thereby compromising their safety and well-being.
[2] Section 28.2 of the Bill of Rights
[3] Section 154(3) of the Criminal Procedure Amendment Act of 2021